Skip to content

Status vs. Results

Definition

The fifth and "ultimate" dysfunction is members caring about something other than the team's collective goals. Lencioni names two specific substitutes that quietly replace results as the thing people are actually optimizing for: team status — the satisfaction of merely belonging to a prestigious or well-regarded group, regardless of what it achieves — and individual status — advancing one's own position or reputation at the team's expense. He's explicit that results here are not limited to financial metrics; they mean any outcome-based performance goal a team has committed to.

In the Book

The book singles out "altruistic nonprofit organizations," political groups, academic departments, and prestigious companies as especially prone to team-status substitution — organizations that come to believe "the nobility of their mission is enough to justify their satisfaction" even absent results. This dysfunction sits at the top of the pyramid because it's the compounding failure of all four below it: "no amount of trust, conflict, commitment, or accountability can compensate for a lack of desire to win." Remedies include public declaration of results (teams that publicly commit to specific outcomes work with more urgency than teams that say "we'll do our best," which the book calls "subtly, if not purposefully, preparing themselves for failure") and tying rewards to outcomes rather than effort, since rewarding pure effort "sends a message that achieving the outcome may not be terribly important after all."

Why It Matters

This concept explains a failure mode that looks like success from inside the group — people are engaged, proud, busy — while the thing the group was actually formed to produce quietly stops being anyone's real priority. It's a useful diagnostic anywhere prestige or belonging is available as a cheaper substitute for the harder, riskier work of producing a measurable outcome: a research lab proud of its reputation rather than its findings, a company proud of its brand rather than its numbers, a committee proud of existing rather than deciding anything.