Skip to content

Rewards Rupture Relationships

Definition

Rewards rest on the assumption that a group's success is just the sum of separate individual performances, so they are typically handed out to individuals in competition with each other. This structurally undermines the cooperation that quality work usually depends on. Two arrangements make it worse: artificial scarcity, where only one person can win regardless of how well everyone does, and collective reward, where the whole group's payoff depends on everyone behaving — which sets people to policing and resenting each other rather than the person holding the reward.

In the Book

Kohn uses the "Genius of the Week" badge — a prize for the single highest quiz score in a class — to show how artificial scarcity teaches that classmates are obstacles, not resources: it directly discourages the kind of skill- and resource-sharing that produces excellence. He contrasts this with the classroom ice cream party promised "if all of us stay on our very best behavior," which converts one child's misstep into a target for the whole group's fury — "divide and conquer," in his phrase — rather than any real concern for the group's wellbeing. He cites research by Carole Ames showing that competitive settings lead people to attribute outcomes to luck or fixed ability rather than effort, reducing their sense of control over future performance, and notes that shifting from individual to team-based incentives doesn't fix this — it just moves the rivalry up a level, pitting teams against each other instead of individuals.

Why It Matters

Any system that ranks or rations a payoff among people who are supposed to be on the same side — stack-ranked performance reviews, sales leaderboards, scarce promotion slots, grading on a curve — is implicitly trading cooperation for competition, whether or not that's the designer's intent. This gives you a diagnostic: before adding a reward to a group setting, ask whether it is scarce or collective, and trace who becomes the rival or scapegoat as a result, not just who becomes motivated.