Skip to content

The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes — Companion

Imre Lakatos's answer to the Popper–Kuhn war: science is rational, but the unit of rationality is not the theory — it's the research programme, a long campaign with a protected hard core, an adjustable belt, and a battle plan. Progress means predicting novel facts; degeneration means explaining yesterday. This companion is organized by concept rather than by the book's dense paper-structure.

Each concept page includes an audio overview, a start infographic (read before), and a shift infographic (read after).


The 9 Concepts

# Concept Core Move
1 The Problem: Rescuing Rationality Judge trajectories, not snapshots
2 Sophisticated Falsificationism No falsification without a better rival
3 The Research Programme Science as long-running campaigns with structure
4 The Hard Core Protect foundations by explicit decision
5 The Protective Belt Route anomalies to the adjustable periphery
6 The Positive Heuristic Plan the sequence of better models
7 Progressive vs Degenerating Predicting novelty vs explaining away
8 No Instant Rationality Verdicts are retrospective; keep honest score
9 History and Methodology Test methodologies against history itself

The Architecture

Hard core (protected by the negative heuristic) → protective belt (absorbs refutation) → positive heuristic (plans the belt's evolution) → scored as progressive or degenerating over time.

Master Themes

  • Trajectory over snapshot — everything is anomaly-ridden; growth is the test
  • Refutation requires a rival — grievances don't kill frameworks, alternatives do
  • Protection is a policy — tenacity as strategy, with an expiry condition
  • Novel facts are the currency — a few stunning predictions outweigh oceans of accommodation
  • Rationality runs slow — honest scorekeeping, not instant verdicts

Study Guides

Condensed study guides per concept — key terms, checklists, self-tests.


Improve this companion

Spotted something weak, missing, or wrong? One click, prefilled:

Send feedback on Scientific Research Programmes