Skip to content

Chapter 14 — Localness

Core Thesis

People learn fastest with genuine responsibility for their own actions; helplessness kills the incentive to learn. Localness pushes decision authority as far from the center as possible — but two unsolved problems recur: senior managers' emotional resistance to giving up control, and the risk that enthusiastic local decision-makers aren't necessarily good ones.

Key Episode

Kollmorgen's roller-skate illustration for "the illusion of being in control": two roller skates connected by a spring, one controlling the other's motion, is tricky but doable; add a third skate on a spring with a different spring constant, and control from the first skate degrades fast; keep adding skates and control from one end becomes hopeless. Real organizations have thousands of such couplings — "one person dictating orders from one end of the line cannot possibly control what happens." The Tragedy of the Commons (Garrett Hardin): the Sahel, once fertile pastureland supporting 100,000+ herdsmen and 500,000+ head of zebu cattle, became barren desert by the 1970s as each herdsman rationally expanded his own herd for individual gain until collective overgrazing crossed a threshold — reinforcing desertification, then drought, then 50-80% livestock death. Corporate version: divisions sharing a support staff each mark their own requests "high priority" until the label means nothing and service quality collapses for everyone.

The Mechanism

Genuine "control without controlling" is distributed, like the body's own regulatory systems — imagine the immune system waiting for central approval before releasing antibodies against an infection; by the time permission arrives, the infection has won. Shell — one of the most localized large corporations, 100+ largely autonomous operating companies — solved coordination not by recentralizing but by building shared mental models: "strategies are the product of a world view... otherwise, decentralized strategic decisions will result in management anarchy" (Pierre Wack). Bill Gore's "water-line" principle at W.L. Gore: associates are encouraged to take risks freely above the water line (a mistake won't sink the ship) but must consult broadly before any action that could go "below the water line" and threaten the whole organization — actionable guidance for managing shared "commons" (capital, reputation, customer goodwill, employee morale) without recentralizing everything.

The Shift

Forgiveness as an organizational practice, not sentiment: Johnson & Johnson chairman General Robert Wood Johnson congratulated a young James Burke for a costly failed product launch — "if you are making mistakes, that means you are making decisions and taking risks... we won't grow unless you take risks." Captain Kohei Asoh, who landed a JAL DC-8 two and a half miles short of the runway in San Francisco Bay in 1968 (a gentle, undamaging touchdown, all 96 passengers evacuated safely), took full personal responsibility at the inquiry rather than deflecting — and was allowed to keep flying until retirement. "Making the mistake is punishment enough" (Cray Research's John Rollwagen).

The new role for central management once local units genuinely control their own decisions: not issuing orders, but manager as researcher and designer — understanding the organization as a system and designing the learning processes (e.g., microworlds, Ch. 17) that let local decision-makers develop accurate shared mental models, a role that cannot be delegated because only the center has the breadth of perspective to see it.

Key Terms

  • Localness — pushing decision authority as far from the center as possible
  • Tragedy of the Commons (Hardin) — individually rational local decisions that collectively deplete a shared resource
  • Water-line principle (Bill Gore) — free experimentation above a line; broad consultation required below it
  • Manager as researcher/designer — central management's role once local units genuinely self-govern

Connections